Phil Willon, Los Angeles
A program to cut diesel emissions at the ports of Los Angeles and Long
Beach by phasing out older cargo trucks is far ahead of schedule, and
already has delivered cleaner air to nearby neighborhoods that have
been enveloped by fumes, the mayors of both cities said Thursday.
A year after the adjacent ports launched their "clean trucks" program,
new, low-emission big rigs now account for about a third of the trucks
hauling cargo to and from the complex, the busiest harbors in the
nation. Officials said they expect to reduce diesel truck emissions at
both ports by 80% by the end of 2010 -- a year ahead of schedule.
Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa said the program has reduced
diesel truck emissions at his city's port by 70% compared with levels
in 2007, and that 5,500 of the 14,000 trucks visiting the port are now
low-emission big rigs. Long Beach has roughly the same number of clean
trucks operating, its mayor said.
"This is the most successful
effort to clean a port in the world," Villaraigosa said. "I mean, think
about it. Nobody thought it was possible to retrofit 5,000 trucks in a
year, and we're at 5,500 and growing."
The clean trucks
program is a major component of a much broader effort to reduce diesel
emissions at the port complex, one of the top sources of pollution in
Southern California. Port pollution has been blamed for increased rates
of cancer, asthma and other serious health ailments for nearby
residents.
Villaraigosa and Long Beach Mayor Bob Foster
released the figures during a news conference at the Port of Long Beach
on Thursday, when U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator
Lisa P. Jackson announced that $26.5 million in federal grants would
soon go to clean air programs across Southern California.
Last
October, the ports banned all trucks built in or before 1988, and
started to charge trucks that failed to meet 2007 air pollution
standards a $70 fee every time they hauled cargo to and from the ports.
Starting in 2010, trucks built in or before 1994 will be excluded.
Villaraigosa
vowed to continue a legal fight to retain a controversial clean truck
provision that has been suspended by the courts. The provision
prohibits drivers at the Port of Los Angeles from being independent
contractors, requiring instead that they become employees of trucking
companies.
The requirement, which was expected to make it easier
for truckers to unionize, was strongly supported by the mayor and the
International Brotherhood of Teamsters. The Port of Long Beach did not
include that restriction in its program.
Villaraigosa said the
ban was necessary because most independent truckers cannot afford to
buy the new, cleaner big rigs -- which cost more than $100,000 -- which
could impede the process of ridding the ports of old diesel-belching
trucks.
"That's just false," Clayton Boyce, spokesman for the
American Trucking Assn., said in an interview after the mayors' event.
"They're independent business people; they know how to buy a truck and
finance it. He knows nothing about trucking. Before he was mayor, he
was a union organizer, so that's what he knows: organizing."
The
trucking association filed a federal legal challenge to block that
provision and won a federal stay allowing independent truckers to
handle cargo at the Port of Los Angeles until the case goes to trial
next year.
The dramatic reduction in truck emissions at the
port, while independent truckers are still working there, shows the ban
is unnecessary, Boyce said. "If it was true, they wouldn't be way ahead
of schedule," he added.
Foster agreed, saying that both trucking companies and independent truckers have been switching to new, low-emission trucks.
"Driver
status has nothing to do with cleaning the air," Foster said. "In terms
of a clean air program, it adds nothing. . . . In fact, it jeopardizes
it" because of the legal challenge.